Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung MV800
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Released January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
Samsung MV800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Released September 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung MV800 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung MV800, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the MV800 (16MP) is very comparable but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and MV800 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm F900EXR was manufactured 18 months after the MV800 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores against the MV800 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Samsung MV800. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung MV800
| Fujifilm F900EXR | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | September 2011 | More modern by 18 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| MV800 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung MV800
| Fujifilm F900EXR | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR provides outer measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has dimensions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung MV800 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the MV800.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm F900EXR and MV800 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F900EXR and MV800.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have the same MP but different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F900EXR offers the larger sensor which will make achieving bokeh simpler. The more recent Fujifilm F900EXR should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography features
Samsung MV800 Portrait photography features
megapixel count good (16MP)
comes with face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2")
resolution is good (16MP)
provides face detect focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography information
Samsung MV800 Street photography information
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
lighter than average in class (232 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2")
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
has touch focus
lighter than others in class (121 grams)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Sports photography with Samsung MV800
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect AF
small sensor (1/2")
not so great battery power (260 shots)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography information
Samsung MV800 Travel photography information
lighter than average in class (232 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
not so great battery power (260 shots)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than others in class (121 grams)
has touch focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung MV800 as a Landscape photography camera
decently wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
exports RAW formats
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small sensor (1/2")
not so great battery power (260 shots)
lack of Time Lapse function
relatively wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR as a Vlogging camera
Samsung MV800 as a Vlogging camera
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (232 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of external mic socket
relatively wide (26mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
lighter than others in class (121g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung MV800 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-30 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 121 gr (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $380 | $499 |
