Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung NX200
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
90 Imaging
60 Features
57 Overall
58
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Old Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Released February 2012
- Succeeded the Samsung NX100
- Replacement is Samsung NX210
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung NX200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is very comparable but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and NX200 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm F900EXR was unveiled 12 months after the NX200 so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades versus the NX200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Samsung NX200. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung NX200
| Fujifilm F900EXR | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | February 2012 | More modern by 12 months | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer display (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| NX200 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung NX200
| Fujifilm F900EXR | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm F900EXR has got physical measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung NX200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR compared to the NX200.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and NX200 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by checking out technical specs. The picture here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and NX200.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm F900EXR having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung NX200 will provide more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm F900EXR will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung NX200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung NX200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 223 grams (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 618 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 pictures | 330 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $380 | $818 |