Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung ST700
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
99 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Launched January 2013
- Superseded the Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung ST700, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and ST700 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm F900EXR was announced 2 years later than the ST700 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST700 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores versus the ST700 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR & Samsung ST700. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery & Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung ST700
| Fujifilm F900EXR | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 26 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| ST700 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung ST700
| Fujifilm F900EXR | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F900EXR enjoys physical measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST700 has sizing of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung ST700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR against the ST700.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and ST700 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The photograph underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and ST700.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F900EXR offers the bigger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh less difficult. The younger Fujifilm F900EXR should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung ST700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung ST700 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $380 | $280 |