Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB35F
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Succeeded the Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and WB35F (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm F900EXR was introduced 11 months prior to the WB35F and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm F900EXR scores versus the WB35F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm F900EXR | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm F900EXR
| WB35F | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 11 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm F900EXR | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm F900EXR enjoys outside measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR against the WB35F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F900EXR and WB35F.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR contains the bigger sensor which should make getting shallower DOF simpler. The more aged Fujifilm F900EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $380 | $130 |