Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Launched January 2013
  • Old Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly similar but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and WB800F (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm F900EXR was released very close to the WB800F so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm F900EXR matches up vs the WB800F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Samsung WB800F

          

          

            
 Fujifilm F900EXR WB800F 
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm F900EXR

          

          

            
 WB800F Fujifilm F900EXR 
Manually focus  Dial exact focusing
Touch friendly display  Easily navigate
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung WB800F

          

          

            
 Fujifilm F900EXR WB800F 
IntroducedJanuary 2013January 2013Similar age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions
Selfie screen  Neither comes with selfie screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F900EXR comes with physical dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F900EXR versus Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR versus the WB800F.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB800F size comparison
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F900EXR and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Quite often, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F900EXR and WB800F.
Clearly, both cameras offer the same exact megapixels but different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR features the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult.

            Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Photography Glossary        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Portrait photography with Samsung WB800F
43
 decent MP (16 megapixels)
 supports face detection focus
 supports RAW files
 lack of manual focus
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is small (1/2")
43
 focusing manually
 good megapixels (16 megapixels)
 has face detect focusing
 can't use external flash
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Street photography advice
Samsung WB800F Street photography advice
68
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports RAW files
 lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
 screen is fixed
 sensor size is small (1/2")
62
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than average (218 grams)
 no articulating screen
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Sports photography with Samsung WB800F
55
 great zoom range (25-500mm  20.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent MP (16MP)
 supports tracking autofocus
 comes with phase detect auto focus
 sensor size is small (1/2")
 bad battery pack (260 shots)
52
 long zoom range (23-483mm  21.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 good megapixels (16 megapixels)
 has tracking focus
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Travel photography advice
Samsung WB800F Travel photography advice
66
 lighter than competition in class (232g)
 decent MP (16 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 really wide (25mm)
 very long zoom (500mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
 bad battery pack (260 CIPA)
 does not contain selfie friendly screen
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
69
 lighter than average (218g)
 good megapixels (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 quite wide (23mm)
 very long zoom (483mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse function
 display isn't selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Landscape photography with Samsung WB800F
47
 really wide (25mm)
 decent sized screen (3")
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent MP (16 megapixels)
 supports RAW files
 lack of manual focus
 cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 sensor size is small (1/2")
 bad battery pack (260 CIPA)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
49
 focusing manually
 quite wide (23mm)
 nice screen size (3")
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 good megapixels (16 megapixels)
 cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
 doesn't have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm F900EXR
Vlogging with Samsung WB800F
34
 really wide (25mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detection focus
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competition in class (232 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 does not contain selfie friendly screen
 doesn't have external mic port
35
 quite wide (23mm)
 touchscreen enabled
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 has face detect focusing
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than average (218g)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 doesn't have microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
        
                
        

          

            
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Samsung WB800F
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXRSamsung WB800F
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Samsung WB800F
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-01-30 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR II -
Sensor type EXRCMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Max boosted ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Touch focus    
Continuous AF    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
AF live view    
Face detect AF    
Contract detect AF    
Phase detect AF    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.6 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch display    
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 11.0fps -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 232g (0.51 lb) 218g (0.48 lb)
Dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-50A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) Yes
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $380 $300