Clicky

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ

Portability
59
Imaging
40
Features
57
Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR front
 
Olympus SP-565UZ front
Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm HS35EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 687g - 131 x 97 x 126mm
  • Introduced January 2013
  • Earlier Model is Fujifilm HS30EXR
  • Later Model is Fujifilm HS50 EXR
Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Released January 2009
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview

Here is a in depth comparison of the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm HS35EXR (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the Fujifilm HS35EXR (1/2") and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm HS35EXR was introduced 4 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm HS35EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm HS35EXR scores versus the SP-565UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS35EXR over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 Fujifilm HS35EXR SP-565UZ 
ReleasedJanuary 2013January 2009Fresher by 49 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Fujifilm HS35EXR

 SP-565UZ Fujifilm HS35EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and Olympus SP-565UZ

 Fujifilm HS35EXR SP-565UZ 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm HS35EXR comes with outer dimensions of 131mm x 97mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") along with a weight of 687 grams (1.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus Olympus SP-565UZ in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm HS35EXR and the SP-565UZ.

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm HS35EXR and SP-565UZ is 59 and 72 respectively.

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The photograph here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and SP-565UZ.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm HS35EXR having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Fujifilm HS35EXR will provide you with extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm HS35EXR will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR Portrait photography info
Olympus SP-565UZ Portrait photography info
56
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW files
sensor is very small (1/2")
39
manual focus
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR Street photography features
Olympus SP-565UZ Street photography features
55
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
sensor is very small (1/2")
more heavy than competition (687g)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR Sports photography highlights
Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography highlights
55
incredible zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (600 shots)
sensor is very small (1/2")
lacks phase detect auto focus
33
long zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR Travel photography factors
Olympus SP-565UZ Travel photography factors
53
better than average battery life (600 shots)
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (720mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (687g)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
52
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
very long reach (520mm)
missing Timelapse mode
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR Landscape photography highlights
Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography highlights
53
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (600 shots)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2")
missing Timelapse function
40
manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5 inches)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
missing Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm HS35EXR Vlogging info
Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging info
25
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone support
more heavy than competition (687 grams)
24
rather wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm HS35EXR and Olympus SP-565UZ
 Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXROlympus SP-565UZ
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR Olympus SP-565UZ
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2013-01-07 2009-01-15
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR -
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Highest boosted ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 143
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-720mm (30.0x) 26-520mm (20.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/2.8-4.5
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.6 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor with Sunny Day mode -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 11.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.10 m (Wide: 30cm - 7.1m / Tele: 2.0m - 3.8m ) 6.40 m (ISO 200)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 687 grams (1.51 pounds) 413 grams (0.91 pounds)
Physical dimensions 131 x 97 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 30
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 18.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 68
Other
Battery life 600 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-W126 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $380 $400