Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-100
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
Portability
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-100 Key Specs
Fujifilm HS35EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 687g - 131 x 97 x 126mm
- Released January 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm HS30EXR
- Updated by Fujifilm HS50 EXR
Olympus SP-100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Introduced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-100 Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-100, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm HS35EXR (16MP) and the SP-100 (16MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm HS35EXR (1/2") and SP-100 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm HS35EXR was manufactured 12 months earlier than the SP-100 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm HS35EXR scores against the SP-100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR & Olympus Stylus SP-100. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm HS35EXR Gallery & Olympus SP-100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS35EXR over the Olympus SP-100
| Fujifilm HS35EXR | SP-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Fujifilm HS35EXR
| SP-100 | Fujifilm HS35EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and Olympus SP-100
| Fujifilm HS35EXR | SP-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-100 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm HS35EXR has physical measurements of 131mm x 97mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 687 grams (1.51 lbs) and the Olympus SP-100 has dimensions of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") and a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm HS35EXR vs the SP-100.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm HS35EXR and SP-100 is 59 and 63 respectively.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-100 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The picture here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and SP-100.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer the same exact MP albeit different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm HS35EXR uses the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF simpler. The more aged Fujifilm HS35EXR is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm HS35EXR
Portrait photography with Olympus SP-100
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
sensor is small (1/2")
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR Street photography features
Olympus SP-100 Street photography features
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
sensor is small (1/2")
more heavy than competition in class (687g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competitors (594g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SP-100 as a Sports photography camera
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
supports tracking focus
great battery pack (600 per charge)
sensor is small (1/2")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR Travel photography factors
Olympus SP-100 Travel photography factors
great battery pack (600 per charge)
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long zoom (720mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (687 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (594 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR Landscape photography features
Olympus SP-100 Landscape photography features
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (600 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2")
doesn't have Timelapse function
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR Vlogging factors
Olympus SP-100 Vlogging factors
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (687g)
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external microphone socket
slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
more heavy than competitors (594 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Olympus SP-100 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Olympus Stylus SP-100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2014-01-29 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor with Sunny Day mode | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 920k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.10 m (Wide: 30cm - 7.1m / Tele: 2.0m - 3.8m ) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Optional |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 687g (1.51 lb) | 594g (1.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 131 x 97 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 600 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-W126 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $380 | $400 |
