Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Fujifilm S9400W
Portability
54 Imaging
40 Features
71 Overall
52
54 Imaging
40 Features
71 Overall
52
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Fujifilm S9400W Key Specs
Fujifilm HS50 EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 808g - 135 x 101 x 146mm
- Released January 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm HS35EXR
Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Fujifilm S9400W Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Fujifilm S9400W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both of them are offered by FujiFilm. The resolution of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR (16MP) and the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm HS50 EXR (1/2") and Fujifilm S9400W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm HS50 EXR was manufactured 12 months prior to the Fujifilm S9400W so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm HS50 EXR scores versus the Fujifilm S9400W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Fujifilm S9400W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR & Fujifilm FinePix S9400W. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm HS50 EXR Gallery & Fujifilm S9400W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS50 EXR over the Fujifilm S9400W
| Fujifilm HS50 EXR | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Fujifilm HS50 EXR
| Fujifilm S9400W | Fujifilm HS50 EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 12 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Fujifilm S9400W
| Fujifilm HS50 EXR | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Fujifilm S9400W Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm HS50 EXR has got outer dimensions of 135mm x 101mm x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") having a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs) and the Fujifilm S9400W has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Fujifilm S9400W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and the Fujifilm S9400W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Fujifilm S9400W is 54 and 61 respectively.
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Fujifilm S9400W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Fujifilm S9400W.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact resolution but different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm HS50 EXR has got the larger sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF less difficult. The more aged Fujifilm HS50 EXR will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm HS50 EXR Portrait photography advice
Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography advice
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
features face detection focus
supports RAW files
small sensor size (1/2")
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Fujifilm HS50 EXR as a Street photography camera
Fujifilm S9400W as a Street photography camera
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
small sensor size (1/2")
heavier than competition in class (808 grams)
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competitors (670g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Fujifilm HS50 EXR Sports photography information
Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography information
incredible zoom range (24-1000mm 41.7 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
good battery pack (500 per charge)
has phase detect auto focus
small sensor size (1/2")
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
great battery life (500 per charge)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Fujifilm HS50 EXR Travel photography information
Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography information
good battery pack (500 shots)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (1000mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (808g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
great battery life (500 per charge)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (670g)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm HS50 EXR Landscape photography highlights
Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography highlights
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
supports RAW files
good battery pack (500 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2")
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
great battery life (500 CIPA)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm HS50 EXR Vlogging details
Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging details
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has external mic port
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competition in class (808 grams)
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
missing mic port
heavier than competitors (670 grams)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Fujifilm S9400W Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1000mm (41.7x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | 201k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 808 grams (1.78 pounds) | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 135 x 101 x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 500 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $500 | $330 |
