Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Kodak Z990
54 Imaging
40 Features
71 Overall
52
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 808g - 135 x 101 x 146mm
- Announced January 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm HS35EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Additionally Known as EasyShare Max
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Kodak Z990, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR (16MP) and Z990 (12MP) and the Fujifilm HS50 EXR (1/2") and Z990 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm HS50 EXR was unveiled 2 years later than the Z990 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm HS50 EXR scores vs the Z990 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR & Kodak EasyShare Z990. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm HS50 EXR Gallery & Kodak Z990 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS50 EXR over the Kodak Z990
Fujifilm HS50 EXR | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 25 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Fujifilm HS50 EXR
Z990 | Fujifilm HS50 EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Kodak Z990
Fujifilm HS50 EXR | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm HS50 EXR offers outer measurements of 135mm x 101mm x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z990 has dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Kodak Z990 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR versus the Z990.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Z990 is 54 and 68 respectively.
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm HS50 EXR and Z990.
As you can see, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm HS50 EXR using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm HS50 EXR will result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm HS50 EXR provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm HS50 EXR vs Kodak Z990 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z990 |
Also referred to as | - | EasyShare Max |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2011-01-04 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1000mm (41.7x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.90 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 808g (1.78 lbs) | 445g (0.98 lbs) |
Dimensions | 135 x 101 x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $299 |