Fujifilm JX370 vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm JX370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
- 124g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm JX370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Fujifilm JX370 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm JX370 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm JX370 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm JX370 grades versus the WG-M1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm JX370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix JX370 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm JX370 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JX370 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm JX370 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm JX370
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm JX370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | August 2011 | More modern by 37 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm JX370 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm JX370 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm JX370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm JX370 has physical measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm JX370 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm JX370 against the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm JX370 and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm JX370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking specs. The pic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm JX370 and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP so you can expect similar quality of files although you should always take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm JX370 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm JX370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm JX370 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JX370 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix JX370 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-08-11 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-6.2 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1800 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photos | 350 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $159 | $2,000 |