Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102
95 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a189/3a189bd3cf490e6ebadb57db49d13e4292bb4938" alt="Fujifilm FinePix JX500 front Fujifilm FinePix JX500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea7e4/ea7e4ee78f1fa0fb4022ac36c31077cfef4a19c1" alt="Samsung SL102 front Samsung SL102 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 113g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Fujifilm JX500 and Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm JX500 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The Fujifilm JX500 was introduced 3 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm JX500 grades versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix JX500 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm JX500 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JX500 over the Samsung SL102
Fujifilm JX500 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 37 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm JX500
SL102 | Fujifilm JX500 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm JX500 and Samsung SL102
Fujifilm JX500 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm JX500 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 113 grams (0.25 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm JX500 and Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm JX500 against the SL102.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2970d/2970d398a24bfb1f4e080bc04f2f117d75465262" alt="Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm JX500 and SL102 is 95 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8571/b857184724c8fbf8ca07009f1d0b2e76f22427d8" alt="Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm JX500 and SL102.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Fujifilm JX500 to result in greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm JX500 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b19fa/b19fae62d84ee641d3647fdfd12fcbf9bf750b7e" alt="Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f2f8/7f2f8e2ac10f11a7a7a19701832025c6813978cc" alt="Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm JX500 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix JX500 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix JX500 | Samsung SL102 |
Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.3 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 113g (0.25 lb) | 116g (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $90 | $130 |