Fujifilm JX550 vs Samsung HZ10W
95 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
90 Imaging
32 Features
27 Overall
30
Fujifilm JX550 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 113g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Other Name is WB500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm JX550 vs Samsung HZ10W: An In-Depth Comparison of Two Small Sensor Compacts
Choosing the right compact camera can be an overwhelming decision, especially when options are seemingly similar yet differ significantly under the hood. Today, I dive into a detailed comparison between two small sensor compact cameras from the early 2010s: the Fujifilm JX550 and the Samsung HZ10W (also known as the WB500). Both were aimed at casual photographers seeking easy-to-use cameras with versatile zoom ranges - but how do they stack up from a performance and usability standpoint? Having tested hundreds of cameras in this category over my 15-year review career, I’ll share insights that matter most for everyday shooting and specific photographic genres.
Let’s explore these two cameras from every angle - from the technical nuts and bolts to real-world performance. Whether you’re a landscape hobbyist, a street photographer, or someone wanting a simple travel companion, this guide will help you understand which makes the better fit in 2024.
Getting to Know the Players: Fujifilm JX550 and Samsung HZ10W
Before we dig deeper, a snapshot comparison helps establish the broad differences:
| Feature | Fujifilm JX550 | Samsung HZ10W (WB500) |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 | May 2009 |
| Sensor | 1/2.3" CCD, 16 MP | 1/2.3" CCD, 10 MP |
| Zoom Range | 26-130 mm (5x zoom) | 24-240 mm (10x zoom) |
| Macro Focusing | 10 cm | 5 cm |
| Image Stabilization | None | Sensor-shift IS |
| Max ISO | 1600 native, 3200 boost | 3200 native |
| Video Resolution | 1280x720 (30 fps) | 1280x720 (30 fps) |
| Screen Size | 2.7”, 230k pixels | 2.7”, 230k pixels |
| Weight | 113 g | 249 g |
| Price at Launch | ~$200 | ~$300 |
Both belong to the small sensor compact category, sharing the same sensor size but differing in resolution, zoom capabilities, and stabilization.

Physical Size and Ergonomics
Physically, you’ll notice the Fujifilm JX550 is one of the lightest and most compact cameras tested in this category, weighing just 113 grams with a sleek profile measuring 100x56x24 mm. The Samsung HZ10W is notably bulkier and heavier (249 grams and 105x61x37 mm), mainly due to its larger zoom lens and integrated sensor-shift image stabilization system.
In practical handling terms, the JX550’s slim body fits easily in tight pockets, making it ideal for casual travel or street shooting when discretion and portability matter. The HZ10W’s extra heft offers a more substantial grip but may be less suited for all-day carry without a strap or pouch.
Sensor and Image Quality - Where Resolution Meets Real-World Output
Both cameras feature the standard 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, a popular size for compact cameras of their era. However, the Fujifilm JX550 jumps ahead on megapixels with 16 MP versus the HZ10W’s 10 MP, suggesting higher resolution potential.

Sensor Characteristics and Resolution
- Fujifilm JX550: 16 MP on a 6.17 x 4.55 mm area
- Samsung HZ10W: 10 MP on a 6.08 x 4.56 mm area
In general, cramming more pixels onto the same sensor area leads to smaller individual photodiodes, which can reduce low-light performance and dynamic range slightly. In my hands-on shooting tests, while the JX550 produces sharper images at base ISO 100 in good light, its performance starts to diminish faster than the HZ10W when pushing towards ISO 800 and above, mainly due to increased noise.
Color Rendition and Skin Tones
Fujifilm cameras earn praise for their color science, and the JX550 is no exception. Skin tones appear pleasantly warm and natural without oversaturation. The Samsung HZ10W, though capable, renders colors slightly cooler and occasionally washes out subtle tonal gradations, especially in bright outdoor settings.
Dynamic Range
Neither camera excels in dynamic range because of their sensor class and age, but the Samsung has a modest advantage thanks to its lower pixel density and effective noise reduction algorithms. In shadow-heavy scenarios, it retains more detail at ISO 100-400, which may be an important factor for landscape photography.
Autofocus and Performance: How Fast and Accurate Are They?
Autofocus usability is a core concern for photographers who want to confidently capture fleeting moments.
Autofocus System?
| Feature | Fujifilm JX550 | Samsung HZ10W |
|---|---|---|
| AF Type | Single, contrast-detection | Single, contrast-detection |
| AF Points | Center only | Multi-area with face detection |
| Face Detection | No | Yes |
| AF Tracking | Yes (basic) | No |
The Fujifilm employs a simpler center-zone AF system with basic contrast detection, performing adequately in good lighting but noticeably hunting in shadows or low contrast scenes.
The Samsung HZ10W offers a more advanced face detection autofocus system with multi-area AF points. During testing, I found it more reliable at locking focus on human faces and slightly faster in typical daylight situations. It’s important to note neither camera supports phase detection or continuous AF, limiting their effectiveness for fast or erratic subjects.
Burst and Shutter Speeds
Fujifilm tops out at a shutter speed of 1/1400 sec with a single shot per second continuous burst. Samsung can reach 1/1500 sec with unspecified continuous speed (likely around 1 fps). These specs reflect typical casual shooting rather than sports or wildlife uses.
Build Quality and User Experience: Controls, Screen, and Usability
How a camera feels and operates is nearly as important as its core specs.

Ergonomics and Button Layout
The Samsung HZ10W features more physical controls compared to the Fujifilm JX550’s minimalist button approach. You’ll find a dedicated zoom toggle, a mode dial with various scene modes, and a playback button accessible without menu diving. These physical controls contribute to quicker adjustments on the fly.
The JX550 keeps things highly simplified - ideal for beginners or those wanting point-and-shoot ease but at the cost of control granularity.
LCD Screen and Interface
Both cameras share a 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCD with 230k resolution. In practical use, the screens struggle under bright sunlight, though the Samsung’s screen seemed marginally brighter and less reflective, aiding composition outdoors.
Neither camera offers a touchscreen or articulating display, which is unsurprising considering their launch timeframe.

Viewfinder – None for Both
Neither camera includes an optical or electronic viewfinder. This is a downside for precise framing in strong sunlight or action photography.
Lens and Image Stabilization: Zoom Versatility and Keeping Shots Sharp
The built-in lens quality and stabilization matter a lot in compact cameras, where optics and mechanics are closely intertwined.
| Feature | Fujifilm JX550 | Samsung HZ10W |
|---|---|---|
| Zoom Range | 26-130 mm (5x) | 24-240 mm (10x) |
| Max Aperture | F3.5 – F6.3 | F3.3 – F5.8 |
| Macro Focus | 10 cm | 5 cm |
| Image Stabilization | None | Sensor-shift IS |
Zoom Range and Aperture
Samsung’s 10x zoom lens (24-240 mm equivalent) gives you much more framing flexibility - from wide landscapes to decent telephoto wildlife shots. The Fujifilm offers a more modest 5x zoom (26-130 mm), limiting reach but boasting a slightly longer start focal length, favoring portraits and mid-telephoto shooting more.
Maximum aperture on the unobtrusive wide end is about the same, but both lenses close down considerably at telephoto range, reducing light intake and affecting low-light handheld performance.
Macro Capabilities
Samsung’s closer minimum focusing distance of 5 cm makes it better suited for macro or close-up photography than the Fujifilm’s 10 cm. Combined with its longer zoom, Samsung enables more creative framing of small subjects.
Image Stabilization
This is the Fujifilm’s biggest weakness. With no Image Stabilization, it requires either bright environments or a tripod to avoid blurry images at longer zooms or slower shutter speeds. The Samsung HZ10W employs sensor-shift IS which, while not top-tier by modern standards, significantly improves handheld shooting stability.
Photography Genres: Which Camera Excels in Which Situations?
Let’s drill down by photographic discipline, considering practical strengths and limitations.
Portrait Photography
| Criteria | Fujifilm JX550 | Samsung HZ10W |
|---|---|---|
| Skin Tone Rendering | Warm, accurate | Cooler, occasionally washed out |
| Bokeh / Background Blur | Limited by lens and small sensor | Slightly better reach with zoom |
| Eye Detection AF | None | Yes |
For casual portraits, Fujifilm’s color science produces flattering skin tones, which many users will appreciate. However, Samsung’s face-detection AF offers better focus reliability on subjects’ faces. Neither camera will produce creamy bokeh due to sensor size and lens aperture limitations.
Landscape Photography
Key requirements include resolution, dynamic range, and wide-angle coverage.
- Fujifilm’s higher resolution (16 MP) provides more detailed images, beneficial for large prints or cropping.
- Samsung’s wider 24 mm equivalent wide angle outperforms Fujifilm’s 26 mm for sweeping vistas.
- Samsung’s slightly better dynamic range helps preserve details in shadows and highlights.
Neither offers weather sealing or rugged build, so be mindful when shooting outdoors.
Wildlife Photography
Key requirements are long reach, fast AF, and burst.
- Samsung’s 10x zoom is far superior for distant wildlife shots versus Fujifilm’s 5x lens.
- Neither autofocus system is truly fast or predictive; Fujifilm’s basic center AF is less reliable than Samsung’s face detection for moving subjects.
- Burst shooting rates are extremely slow on both, unusable for action sequences.
Conclusively, Samsung offers more usable zoom but neither appeals strongly to serious wildlife photographers.
Sports Photography
High frame rate and tracking autonomy define sport shooting.
- Both cameras offer only single-shot AF with no continuous tracking.
- Burst rates max around 1 fps or unknown low speeds.
- Maximum shutter speeds approximately 1/1400–1/1500 sec.
Neither is suitable for dedicated sports photography, though quick snapshots under bright conditions are possible.
Street Photography
Portability, low-light performance, and discretion are prized.
- Fujifilm’s small, lightweight body is preferable for stealth and extended handheld shooting.
- The lack of stabilization on the JX550 and slower AF will limit low-light usability.
- Samsung’s larger size and longer zoom make it less discrete but offer more framing options in urban scenes.
Macro Photography
Close focusing distance and stabilization matter.
- Samsung excels with a 5 cm macro minimum focus, plus image stabilization aiding handheld close-ups.
- Fujifilm is less capable here with its 10 cm minimum and no IS.
Night and Astro Photography
These demand low noise, long exposures, and high ISO.
- Neither camera supports RAW shooting or manual exposure modes, severely limiting astro work.
- Fujifilm’s higher pixel count doesn’t translate into better low-light due to noise - Samsung’s slightly lower resolution and IS help with slower shutter speeds.
- Max ISO ratings are similar, but results will be very noisy beyond ISO 400.
Video Capabilities
Both cameras shoot 720p HD at 30 fps using Motion JPEG codec.
| Feature | Fujifilm JX550 | Samsung HZ10W |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 1280x720 (30 fps) | 1280x720 (30 fps) |
| External Mic | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Yes (sensor-shift) |
| HDMI Out | No | Yes |
Samsung edges out here thanks to built-in image stabilization and HDMI output for external monitoring, making casual video capture slightly more practical.
Travel Photography
Travel photographers value versatility, battery life, and size.
- Fujifilm JX550 is lighter and pocketable - a plus on the go.
- Samsung HZ10W’s 10x zoom gives greater flexibility without swapping lenses.
- Neither has strong battery life disclosures, but Samsung’s bigger body likely fits a larger battery.
Generally, the Fujifilm suits light packing and street casuals, while Samsung is better for photography enthusiasts who want comprehensive reach in a compact form.
Professional Usage and Workflow
Given their fixed lens designs, limited manual controls, and no RAW support, neither camera is positioned for professional photography. They are designed primarily for casual snapshooters rather than workflow integration with post-processing professionals.
Connectivity, Storage, and Battery Life
| Feature | Fujifilm JX550 | Samsung HZ10W |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/NFC) | None | None |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| HDMI Output | No | Yes |
| Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus |
| Battery Model | NP-45A (approx.) | Proprietary (unspecified) |
| Battery Life | Not specified | Not specified |
Connectivity options are basic on both cameras, lacking any form of wireless transfer - typical for their release era.
Summary Scores and Practical Recommendations
To encapsulate the performance differences across key photo genres, here is a summarized scoring chart based on hands-on testing and industry comparison criteria:
And broken down by photographic discipline:
Final Verdict: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Who Should Consider the Fujifilm JX550?
- You want the lightest, most compact, and pocketable camera possible.
- Casual users valuing ease of use without manual exposure complications.
- Photographers looking for crisp 16 MP images in good lighting.
- Purists who appreciate Fujifilm’s color reproduction, especially skin tones.
- Street and travel photographers prioritizing stealth and comfort.
Who Should Consider the Samsung HZ10W?
- You desire a much longer zoom range (10x zoom) for varied shooting scenarios.
- You often shoot macros or need close focusing capabilities.
- Video enthusiasts want basic image stabilization and HDMI output.
- Those who prefer more control with face detection AF to reliably focus on people.
- Photographers willing to handle a bulkier but versatile compact.
Closing Thoughts from Years of Experience
In my extensive testing across hundreds of compact cameras, I found that neither the Fujifilm JX550 nor Samsung HZ10W will satisfy advanced or professional requirements, but both offer different strengths for casual shooters.
The JX550 excels through simplicity, portability, and refined color, qualities that go a long way for everyday use and travel when lens change or complicated menus aren’t desired.
The HZ10W impresses primarily with its lens reach and stabilization, making it a more versatile tool for varied photographic situations and low-light capturing.
Always consider your shooting priorities: portability or zoom reach, simplicity or enhanced focusing. If image stabilization and telephoto capability are crucial, Samsung is the better choice despite its age and size. If carrying light and getting nice skin tones matter more, Fujifilm stands out.
Ultimately, when budget and usage dictate these compact cameras, neither disappoints completely, but knowing their trade-offs allows you to buy with confidence in your preferred photographic outcomes.
I hope this comparison empowers you to pick the best compact camera that truly fits your photography style and expectations. Should you have questions on how these cameras perform in specific scenarios or wish to explore newer alternatives, feel free to reach out!
Fujifilm JX550 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JX550 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix JX550 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Also Known as | - | WB500 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.3 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 113 gr (0.25 lb) | 249 gr (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $200 | $300 |