Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus 8000
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Olympus 8000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm JZ200 was launched 2 years later than the 8000 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm JZ200 scores versus the 8000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery & Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Olympus 8000
| Fujifilm JZ200 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | July 2009 | More recent by 31 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Fujifilm JZ200
| 8000 | Fujifilm JZ200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Olympus 8000
| Fujifilm JZ200 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm JZ200 provides outer measurements of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus 8000 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Olympus 8000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 versus the 8000.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm JZ200 and 8000 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The photograph below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm JZ200 and 8000.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Fujifilm JZ200 to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm JZ200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135 grams (0.30 lb) | 182 grams (0.40 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $380 |