Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus TG-3
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus TG-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is very close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm JZ200 was introduced 3 years prior to the TG-3 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm JZ200 matches up against the TG-3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Olympus TG-3
| Fujifilm JZ200 | TG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Fujifilm JZ200
| TG-3 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 27 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Olympus TG-3
| Fujifilm JZ200 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm JZ200 comes with external dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus TG-3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 compared to the TG-3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm JZ200 and TG-3 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm JZ200 and TG-3.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of images but you should really take the production date of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm JZ200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 135 grams (0.30 pounds) | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $350 |