Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus VR-320
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm JZ200 was introduced 6 months later than the VR-320 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm JZ200 scores against the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm JZ200 | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm JZ200
| VR-320 | Fujifilm JZ200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm JZ200 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | July 2011 | Same generation |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm JZ200 features exterior dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 versus the VR-320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm JZ200 and VR-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The visual underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm JZ200 and VR-320.
To sum up, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Fujifilm JZ200 to result in greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-01-05 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135 gr (0.30 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $179 |
