Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbb9d/dbb9d560d96ce4312788fc82a94bb844bd487b3f" alt="Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 front Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74efc/74efc246825aff5ab2faab7c06cfeb0ab333069a" alt="Ricoh G900 front Ricoh G900 front"
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm JZ200 and Ricoh G900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Fujifilm JZ200 was released 7 years earlier than the G900 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm JZ200 scores versus the G900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 & Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Ricoh G900
Fujifilm JZ200 | G900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Fujifilm JZ200
G900 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 74 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Ricoh G900
Fujifilm JZ200 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm JZ200 features external measurements of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm JZ200 and Ricoh G900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 against the G900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d326/9d32696249f6baae1e0ead00233647d2f4c2b422" alt="Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm JZ200 and G900 is 95 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1d9/ce1d924b5d0614564790429645c48dc461b85d5e" alt="Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The image here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm JZ200 and G900.
As you can see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Ricoh G900 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm JZ200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a6dd/0a6ddbc05b75167aa5949ca2c6bc9ec8040ca83f" alt="Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22796/22796e22cd34f8f557f44dc052593bf038b80362" alt="Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Ricoh G900 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2018-02-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Flash on, flash off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 135 gr (0.30 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $752 |