Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-80
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-80, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm JZ200 was brought out 11 years prior to the WG-80 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm JZ200 grades versus the WG-80 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 & Ricoh WG-80. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm JZ200 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Fujifilm JZ200
| WG-80 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2022 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 126 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm JZ200 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm JZ200 features outer measurements of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-80 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 versus the WG-80.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm JZ200 and WG-80 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm JZ200 and WG-80.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of images however you need to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm JZ200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.70 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135g (0.30 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $300 |