Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung HZ35W
95 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Additionally Known as WB650
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung HZ35W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe Fujifilm JZ200 was revealed 19 months later than the HZ35W making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm JZ200 scores against the HZ35W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 and Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Samsung HZ35W
| Fujifilm JZ200 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | June 2010 | Fresher by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Fujifilm JZ200
| HZ35W | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Samsung HZ35W
| Fujifilm JZ200 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm JZ200 offers external dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 compared to the HZ35W.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm JZ200 and HZ35W is 95 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The visual here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm JZ200 and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Fujifilm JZ200 to give more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm JZ200 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called | - | WB650 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 135 gr (0.30 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $300 |