Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung ST6500
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
              
              99 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
 - 3" Fixed Screen
 - ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
 - Optical Image Stabilization
 - 1280 x 720 video
 - 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
 - 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
 - Introduced January 2012
 
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
 - 3" Fixed Screen
 - ISO 80 - 3200
 - 1280 x 720 video
 - 26-130mm (F) lens
 - n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
 - Launched January 2011
 
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide        Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung ST6500 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Samsung ST6500, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and the ST6500 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm JZ200 was manufactured 12 months after the ST6500 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm JZ200 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm JZ200 scores vs the ST6500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary        Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung ST6500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 & Samsung ST6500. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery & Samsung ST6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Samsung ST6500
| Fujifilm JZ200 | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | January 2011 | More modern by 12 months | 
Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Fujifilm JZ200
| ST6500 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate | 
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Samsung ST6500
| Fujifilm JZ200 | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | 
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm JZ200 features outer dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Samsung ST6500 has sizing of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Samsung ST6500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 compared to the ST6500.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm JZ200 and ST6500 is 95 and 99 respectively.
          Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The image here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm JZ200 and ST6500.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of pictures however you would want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent Fujifilm JZ200 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
          Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder
        
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
        
                
        Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Samsung ST6500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung | 
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Samsung ST6500 | 
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact | 
| Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2011-01-19 | 
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel | 
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 | 
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 | 
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - | 
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 | 
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens | 
| Lens zoom range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 
| Max aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | - | 
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - | 
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 | 
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches | 
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None | 
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s | 
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s | 
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | - | 
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | - | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 | 
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 | 
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - | 
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135g (0.30 lbs) | - | 
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - | 
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - | 
| Card slots | 1 | 1 | 
| Launch cost | $0 | - |