Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung TL240
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Samsung TL240, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm JZ200 was announced 2 years later than the TL240 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm JZ200 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm JZ200 grades versus the TL240 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 & Samsung TL240. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Samsung TL240
| Fujifilm JZ200 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Fujifilm JZ200
| TL240 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Samsung TL240
| Fujifilm JZ200 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm JZ200 enjoys external measurements of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 versus the TL240.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm JZ200 and TL240 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The visual here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm JZ200 and TL240.
As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Fujifilm JZ200 to give you extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm JZ200 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Samsung TL240 |
| Alternative name | - | ST5000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 135 grams (0.30 pounds) | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $171 |