Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB350F
95 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
Photography Glossary Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Samsung WB350F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is pretty similar and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm JZ200 was brought out 24 months earlier than the WB350F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm JZ200 matches up vs the WB350F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm JZ200 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Fujifilm JZ200
| WB350F | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm JZ200 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm JZ200 has got physical dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 compared to the WB350F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm JZ200 and WB350F is 95 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm JZ200 and WB350F.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures however you really should consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The older Fujifilm JZ200 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Samsung WB350F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135 grams (0.30 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $260 |