Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB800F
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Samsung WB800F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively similar and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm JZ200 was manufactured 12 months prior to the WB800F so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm JZ200 scores vs the WB800F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm JZ200 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm JZ200
| WB800F | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 12 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm JZ200 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm JZ200 has got exterior measurements of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 compared to the WB800F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm JZ200 and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The image here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm JZ200 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution so you should expect similar quality of files however you should consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm JZ200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135g (0.30 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $300 |