Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma Quattro H
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35


78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Sigma Quattro H, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the Fujifilm JZ200 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm JZ200 was revealed 5 years prior to the Quattro H and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm JZ200 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm JZ200 matches up against the Quattro H in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 and Sigma sd Quattro H. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Sigma Quattro H
Fujifilm JZ200 | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Fujifilm JZ200
Quattro H | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 50 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Sigma Quattro H
Fujifilm JZ200 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm JZ200 features exterior dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm JZ200 versus Sigma Quattro H in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 vs the Quattro H.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm JZ200 and Quattro H is 95 and 78 respectively.

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The visual here may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Quattro H.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm JZ200 using its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sigma Quattro H will result in more detail because of its extra 29MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older Fujifilm JZ200 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm JZ200 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-01-05 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 45 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 6200 x 4152 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.8 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 135 grams (0.30 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-45A | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $0 | $1,134 |