Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S9200
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Fujifilm S9200, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by FujiFilm. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was brought out 5 years before the Fujifilm S9200 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 scores against the Fujifilm S9200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S9200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Fujifilm FinePix S9200. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Fujifilm S9200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Fujifilm S9200
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | Fujifilm S9200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
Fujifilm S9200 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | July 2009 | More modern by 54 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Fujifilm S9200
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has got exterior dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") with a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Fujifilm S9200 has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Fujifilm S9200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 against the Fujifilm S9200.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Fujifilm S9200 is 90 and 61 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Fujifilm S9200.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Fujifilm S9200 to result in greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W1 will be behind in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1700s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 7.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 260 grams (0.57 lbs) | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
Style of battery | - | AA |
Battery model | NP-95 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $900 | $300 |