Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
![Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1/Fujifilm-Real-3D-W1-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S6200 front Nikon Coolpix S6200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6200/Nikon-S6200-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Announced August 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Nikon S6200, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Nikon. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and S6200 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was revealed 3 years earlier than the S6200 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 matches up against the S6200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 & Nikon Coolpix S6200. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery & Nikon S6200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Nikon S6200
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | S6200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 2.8" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.1") |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
S6200 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Nikon S6200
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | S6200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 comes with outside dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") along with a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Nikon S6200 has sizing of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Nikon S6200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 against the S6200.
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6200-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and S6200 is 90 and 94 respectively.
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The image here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and S6200.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Nikon S6200 to give you greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 sensor size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Nikon S6200 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Nikon Coolpix S6200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2011-08-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | RP (Real Photo) 3D | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.2-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.8" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 260g (0.57 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-95 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $900 | $229 |