Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 9000
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was announced 3 months after the 9000 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 matches up against the 9000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Olympus 9000
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 2.8" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.1") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| 9000 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus 9000
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 |  | May 2009 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 comes with outer measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") with a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus the 9000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and 9000 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at specifications. The image below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and 9000.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus 9000 to give more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju 9000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.8" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 260 grams (0.57 lbs) | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-95 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $900 | $300 |