Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
![Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1/Fujifilm-Real-3D-W1-front.jpg)
![Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-TG-630-iHS/Olympus-TG-630-iHS-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was launched 4 years prior to the TG-630 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 scores against the TG-630 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TG-630 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
TG-630 iHS | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 42 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has got physical measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") along with a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-630 iHS has dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 compared to the TG-630 iHS.
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Olympus-TG-630-iHS-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TG-630 iHS is 90 and 94 respectively.
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Olympus-TG-630-iHS-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TG-630 iHS.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-630 iHS to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Olympus-TG-630-iHS-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W1-vs-Olympus-TG-630-iHS-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 260g (0.57 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-95 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $900 | $200 |