Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively close and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was manufactured 3 years prior to the TG-1 iHS and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 scores versus the TG-1 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| TG-1 iHS | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 34 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has physical measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has sizing of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TG-1 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing specifications. The graphic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TG-1 iHS.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-1 iHS to render more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W1 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 260 grams (0.57 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-95 | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $900 | $399 |