Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was announced 4 years earlier than the TG-2 iHS which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 grades against the TG-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| TG-2 iHS | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 47 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has outer dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") along with a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs the TG-2 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TG-2 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The pic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-2 iHS to show greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 260 gr (0.57 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-95 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $900 | $380 |