Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was introduced 4 years before the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
XZ-2 iHS | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | July 2009 | Fresher by 41 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 features exterior measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") having a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and XZ-2 iHS is 90 and 85 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The graphic below will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will result in extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W1 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 260g (0.57 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-95 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $900 | $450 |