Clicky

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
90
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Fujifilm Real 3D W1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
  • Announced July 2009
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Additionally Known as PL50
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Its time to examine more in depth at the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was manufactured 6 months later than the SL202 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 matches up against the SL202 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Samsung SL202

 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 SL202 
Screen dimension2.8"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.1")

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1

 SL202 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 

Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Samsung SL202

 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 SL202 
IntroducedJuly 2009February 2009Same generation
Manual focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has got external measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Contrast the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Samsung SL202 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and the SL202.

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The photograph here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and SL202.

As you have seen, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of files however you should take the production date of the cameras into account.

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Portrait photography camera
19
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
25
offers face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Street photography details
Samsung SL202 Street photography details
45
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than competition (260g)
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Sports photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Sports photography highlights
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm Real 3D W1
Travel photography with Samsung SL202
48
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (260 grams)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
57
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Landscape photography information
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography information
26
screen size is decent (2.8 inch)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
27
rather wide (28mm)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm Real 3D W1
Vlogging with Samsung SL202
21
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than competition (260 grams)
27
rather wide (28mm)
offers face detect autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Samsung SL202
 Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1Samsung SL202
General Information
Company FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 Samsung SL202
Also referred to as - PL50
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-07-22 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip RP (Real Photo) 3D -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing range 8cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.8 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/4 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1000 secs 1/1500 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.60 m 4.60 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 260 gr (0.57 lbs) 168 gr (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-95 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $900 $140