Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL240
90 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also Known as ST5000
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Samsung TL240, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and TL240 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was unveiled 5 months earlier than the TL240 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 grades against the TL240 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Samsung TL240. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Samsung TL240
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TL240 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| TL240 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.7") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Samsung TL240
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2009 | January 2010 | Same generation | |
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 enjoys outside measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") having a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Samsung TL240 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and the TL240.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TL240 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through technical specs. The visual here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TL240.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung TL240 to render more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called | - | ST5000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.8" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 260 gr (0.57 lbs) | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-95 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $900 | $171 |