Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL320
90 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also referred to as WB1000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Samsung TL320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was revealed 5 months after the TL320 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 grades versus the TL320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 and Samsung TL320. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Samsung TL320
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TL320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| TL320 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Samsung TL320
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2009 |  | February 2009 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 provides outside dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Samsung TL320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and the TL320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TL320 is 90 and 98 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through specs. The pic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and TL320.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung TL320 to render more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Samsung TL320 |
| Alternative name | - | WB1000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 260 grams (0.57 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-95 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $900 | $380 |