Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB210
90 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
36 Features
45 Overall
39
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Samsung WB210, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was revealed 24 months before the WB210 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 scores against the WB210 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 & Samsung WB210. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Samsung WB210
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Crisper display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| WB210 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.7") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Samsung WB210
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 comes with outer dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus the WB210.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and WB210 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and WB210.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB210 to result in greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W1 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.8" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 260g (0.57 lb) | 174g (0.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-95 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $900 | $279 |