Clicky

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
90
Imaging
32
Features
17
Overall
26
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Fujifilm Real 3D W1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
  • Released July 2009
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Here is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was announced 5 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 scores against the DP2 Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1

 DP2 Quattro Fujifilm Real 3D W1 
ReleasedFebruary 2014July 2009Fresher by 55 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen sizing3"2.8"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has physical measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") and a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 against the DP2 Quattro.

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and DP2 Quattro is 90 and 70 respectively.

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing specs. The visual underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will deliver extra detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Portrait photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography information
19
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
77
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides face detection focusing
exports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm Real 3D W1
Street photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
45
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than others in class (260 grams)
61
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Sports photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography factors
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
47
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Travel photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography advice
48
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (260 grams)
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
53
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Landscape photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography details
26
screen size is good (2.8 inch)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
59
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3")
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
21
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic socket
heavier than others in class (260 grams)
9
no video shooting
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Sigma
Model Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2009-07-22 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip RP (Real Photo) 3D TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/2.8
Macro focus range 8cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.60 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 260 grams (0.57 lb) 395 grams (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-95 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $900 $931