Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was manufactured 20 months later than the SP-565UZ making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up against the SP-565UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 | January 2009 | More recent by 20 months | |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") | |
| Display resolution | 1150k | 230k | Crisper display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| SP-565UZ | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 provides physical dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has proportions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 compared to the SP-565UZ.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and SP-565UZ is 90 and 72 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading technical specs. The graphic here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and SP-565UZ.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact MP so you should expect similar quality of photographs however you will want to consider the release date of the products into consideration. The younger Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-08-17 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,150 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 1s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 413 gr (0.91 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $900 | $400 |