Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was revealed 7 months after the SP-800 UZ and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades versus the SP-800 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 7 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| SP-800 UZ | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 offers outside dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
See the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 against the SP-800 UZ.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and SP-800 UZ is 90 and 69 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The image here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and SP-800 UZ.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus SP-800 UZ to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm Real 3D W3 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-08-17 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,150 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 12 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 455g (1.00 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $900 | $270 |