Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 5010

Two Compact Cameras from 2010: FujiFilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus Stylus 5010 – A Detailed Hands-On Comparison

When stepping back to revisit cameras released over a decade ago, the challenge is twofold: how do the specs hold up today, and what lessons can photographers and collectors glean from them? The Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and the Olympus Stylus 5010, both released in 2010, each target that small sensor compact market but in very different ways. I’ve spent considerable time with both - testing their quirks, pushing their limits, and comparing how they balance between convenience, image quality, and usability for various photographic styles.

If you’re curious about how these relics might still serve you, or want to appreciate the evolutionary trajectory of compact cameras, stay with me. I’ll take you through their build, image tech, autofocus, actual shooting experiences, and ultimately tell you who they’re for - from enthusiasts craving retro thrills to casual users on a budget.

Size, Feel, and Design: More Than Just Pocketability

When it comes to travel or everyday carry, compact size and ergonomic comfort are top of mind. The FujiFilm Real 3D W3 is a chunky girlfriend compared to the Olympus Stylus 5010, its cousin in the ultracompact family. The Fuji measures 124x66x28mm and weighs in at 230 grams - fairly hefty for a compact - while the Olympus trims down to 95x56x20mm and 126 grams.

This size difference isn’t just about pocket space. The Fuji’s larger body offers better grip security, especially for people with bigger hands. Its heft provides a reassuring feeling, though it’s not as sleek as Olympus’s slick and slimmer build, which is a delight if you favor discretion for street shooting. However, that extra bulk on the Fuji also accommodates a bigger, more vibrant screen and the specialized stereoscopic 3D capability - a feature that really sets it apart in a market full of standard compacts.

Studying their top plates, Fuji’s control layout feels more deliberate; it has dedicated buttons focused on aperture priority mode - a rarity in compacts of this era. Olympus, in contrast, keeps things minimalistic and straightforward, with limited control dials or buttons, which might frustrate users accustomed to manual tweaking but ultimately caters to point-and-shoot simplicity.

If you prize ergonomics and some semblance of creative control without lugging around a DSLR, Fuji’s body patiently waits for you to explore its buttons. The Stylus 5010 prioritizes speed and simplicity over customization and control.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the matter

Both cameras feature a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor - the size typical for compacts back then - but there are meaningful differences in sensor resolution and processing that influence image quality quite a bit.

The Olympus boasts a 14MP sensor with maximum resolution of 4288x3216 pixels, modestly outpacing the Fujifilm’s 10MP max at 3648x2736 pixels. Higher resolution means Olympus’s images contain more detail - useful if you want to crop or print larger photos - though megapixels aren’t the only factor at play.

The FujiFilm Real 3D W3 shines in its innovative 3D RP (Real Photo) HD processor that tackles stereoscopic imaging, combining data from two lenses spaced apart to mimic human binocular vision. While this adds a futuristic flair and lets you capture true 3D photos - a feature Olympia skips - it naturally complicates image rendering and impacts overall sharpness compared to Olympus’s traditional approach.

Speaking of sensor specs, Fuji settles for a narrower ISO range of 100 to 1600 native (no boosted ISO), while Olympus goes broader from 64 to 3200 ISO, allowing better low-light performance. Neither excels as a low-light champion by today’s standards, but Olympus does edge ahead when it comes to noise handling, thanks to a newer TruePic III processor.

Color rendition is another area where personal preference emerges. Fuji’s images trend towards vibrant, saturated hues - classic Fujifilm film simulation vibes that photographers love. Olympus delivers more neutral and true-to-life colors, which might appeal if you prefer minimal post-processing.

LCD Screen and Visual Interface: Seeing is Believing

The Fuji offers a 3.5-inch fixed LCD with a high resolution of 1150k dots, quite large and sharp for 2010 compacts. Meanwhile, Olympus houses a smaller 2.7-inch screen with just 230k dots - a substantial difference you notice immediately when composing or reviewing images.

That bigger and crisper screen on Fuji makes framing, especially for 3D shots, more intuitive and enjoyable. It feels ahead of its time versus Olympus’s modest display, which looks pixelated by comparison. However, neither camera includes a viewfinder, electronic or optical, so in bright sunlight, you might find it tricky to compose on both models.

Fuji’s interface is geared toward enthusiasts with more options accessible through menus, especially aperture priority control. Olympus keeps it beginner-friendly. Neither supports touchscreen or live view focusing aids beyond the basics, so patience and familiarity pay off here.

Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness

Autofocus (AF) speed and accuracy can make or break your photographic experience - particularly with moving subjects or quick candid moments.

Both cameras utilize contrast-detection AF systems, which in this low-budget compact era meant they’re not blazing fast. Fujifilm sticks to single-shot AF with center-weighted focus and no face detection or tracking. Olympus advances slightly with AF tracking capability (a rarity at this price point) and multi-area AF.

In practical terms, Olympus’s AF felt a touch snappier and more dependable in mixed lighting. Subjects locked focus more quickly, and continuous shooting at 1 fps gave a minimal but usable burst mode for casual action. Fuji’s AF lag was more noticeable, and its max shutter speed is capped at 1/1000 sec, less flexible for fast action or bright daylight scenarios.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing

Given their compact consumer orientation, neither camera sports weather sealing, shockproofing, or freezeproof features. Olympus’s lightweight body feels more plastic-y, whereas Fuji’s heftier shell conveys durability, albeit without rugged reliability.

If you shoot outdoors often or in variable weather, neither is ideal, but Fuji’s body is less likely to get damaged from accidental knocks or drops. Still, both are typical delicate compacts - so treat them kindly!

Lens Specs and Versatility: Zoom vs Aperture

Let’s talk optics - Olympus Stylus 5010 sports a 26-130mm equivalent zoom (5×), starting wider at f/2.8 max aperture and ending at a slower f/6.5 telephoto. Fuji’s fine-tuning adorns a 35-105mm equivalent zoom (3×) at f/3.7-f/4.2, missing the ultra-wide advantage but boasting a smoother aperture range.

The Stylus’s wider starting lens benefits street and landscape photography, granting that broader angle necessary for capturing architecture or tight interiors. Olympus’s variable aperture range hurts low-light telephoto shooting, whereas Fuji’s narrower zoom range - and absence of image stabilization - limits reach but gives consistent aperture performance across the frame.

The FujiFilm Real 3D W3 lacks any built-in optical image stabilization, while Olympus incorporates sensor-shift IS, a huge boon for handheld shooting, especially at the telephoto end or in dim conditions.

Macro and Close-Up Capability

Macro photographers often treasure shorter focal minimums and close focusing distances.

Olympus lets you shoot as close as 7cm, giving a chance to capture detailed flower or food shots with decent magnification. Fuji is similar, with an 8cm minimum focusing distance. Both cameras, however, suffer from fixed lenses and limited manual focus control, which restrains creativity and precision.

If you love tipping into macro territory casually, Olympus’s stabilization and wider angle slightly tip the scales for versatility here.

Video Recording Capabilities

Both cameras record HD video at 1280x720 resolution but with differences in frame rates and formats.

Olympus offers smooth 720p footage at 30 fps, making it a better pick for basic movie capture. Fuji records at 24 fps, which brings a cinematic frame rate but sometimes compromises motion smoothness for fast action.

Neither camera has microphone or headphone jacks, so audio options are limited to built-in mics. No 4K or advanced video features here; this is straightforward, grab-and-record territory well suited for casual use during family events or travel.

Battery Life and Storage

Both shoot on proprietary lithium-ion batteries: Fuji’s NP-50 and Olympus’s Li-50B - both reasonably common and interchangeable with later models. Battery life ratings aren’t widely published for these models, but in hands-on experience, Olympus's lighter body correlates to slightly less endurance than Fuji’s more robust build.

Each camera supports SD/SDHC cards and contains minimal internal memory as a backup. No dual slots or fast card options here, so be prepared for moderate capacity cards and frequent swaps if shooting extensively.

Connectivity and Extras

Neither the FujiFilm Real 3D W3 nor Olympus Stylus 5010 supports wireless connectivity like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC - no surprises given the release era. Both have USB 2.0 ports and HDMI outputs for image transfer and viewing on TVs, which covers basic needs.

Neither supports RAW file capture, limiting professional post-processing flexibility. This is a significant limitation for enthusiasts who desire full control over image editing.

Real-World Usage and Suitability Across Photography Types

Now, to the meat of the matter. How do these two compacts perform across major photography genres? Having tested them under varied conditions, here are my impressions and recommendations:

Portrait Photography: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Eye Detection

Neither camera has face detection or eye AF, so you’ll rely on manual aiming and focus confirmation through the LCD. Fuji’s color science lends a pleasing warmth to skin tones, giving portraits an immediately attractive, if slightly saturated, aesthetic. Olympus stays neutral but sacrifices some punch.

Bokeh quality is limited by the small sensor and moderate apertures; neither camera offers shallow depth-of-field magic. Fuji’s slightly better sharpness at mid-range might help produce crisper faces. Olympus’s wider lens starting point is less ideal for headshots but useful for group portraits.

Winner: FujiFilm for color rendition and framing versatility.

Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range, Resolution, and Weatherproofing

With Olympus’s higher resolution sensor (14MP vs 10MP), images deliver more detail and flexibility in cropping. The lack of weather sealing on both models is a concern, but if shooting in fair weather, Olympus’s broader angle is preferred for landscape expanses.

Dynamic range is limited on both; shadows tend to block up under harsher light. Fuji’s oversaturated colors can be a boost or hinderance depending on style. Neither camera supports RAW, so HDR workflows are impossible.

Winner: Olympus for resolution and wider angle suited to landscapes.

Wildlife and Sports Photography: Autofocus and Continuous Shooting

Both cameras fall behind here. Fuji lacks continuous AF and burst modes, limiting action capture. Olympus affords a slow 1fps burst and AF tracking, though slow by modern standards.

Neither camera excels with telephoto reach or fast shutter speeds, which will frustrate dedicated wildlife or sports photogs.

Winner: Olympus, but strongly recommended only for casual shooting.

Street Photography: Discreteness, Low Light, and Portability

Olympus’s smaller size and quieter operation make it better for stealthy street shots. Fuji’s louder mechanisms and bulk break the candid vibe.

Low light remains tricky for both; Olympus’s broader ISO range and stabilization edge out Fuji’s in dim urban scenes.

Winner: Olympus for portability and stabilisation.

Macro Photography: Magnification and Close Focus

As noted earlier, Olympus’s slight advantage in stabilisation and focal length flexibility makes it more adept for casual macro. Fuji can do the job but lacks focusing finesse.

Winner: Olympus for macro enthusiasts.

Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure Modes

Neither camera is designed for starfield shots or long exposures. Fuji’s max shutter speed tops at 1/1000, while Olympus goes to 1/2000 - irrelevant for long exposures, but both lack manual exposure and bulb modes.

High ISO noise is prominent; Olympus edges ahead due to its extended ISO range, but expect heavy noise in both.

Winner: Olympus for ISO versatility, but both are limited.

Video Capabilities: Recording Specs and Stabilization

While both max out at HD 720p, Olympus’s 30 fps gives smoother results versus Fuji’s cinematic 24 fps. Olympus’s image stabilization also benefits handheld videos by minimizing shake.

Winner: Olympus for video shooters.

Travel Photography: Versatility, Battery, and Size

This category weighs multiple factors. Olympus’s small size, light weight, image stabilization, and broader lens put it ahead for casual travel photography. Fuji’s larger size and gimmicky 3D function feel less practical on the road.

Battery life is comparable, but higher-resolution stills on Olympus might consume storage faster.

Winner: Olympus for sheer practicality on the go.

Professional Work: Reliability, File Format, and Workflow

Neither supports RAW or offers manual exposure beyond Fuji’s aperture priority mode. Neither is truly professional - more consumer compacts. Fuji’s more sophisticated exposure settings marginally improve professional usability, but workflow flexibility is minimal on both.

Winner: Fuji edges out in exposure options, but professional photographers likely look elsewhere.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 front Fujifilm Real 3D W3 screen back Olympus 5010 front Olympus 5010 screen back

These sample images illustrate the color and tonal differences described - Fuji’s images pop, but with more punchiness than subtlety; Olympus images feel accurate but somewhat flat.

Final Scores and Verdict

Putting together all performance aspects yields this overall comparison:

And a detailed genre breakdown adds clarity:

The Bottom Line: Which Compact Powers Your Passion?

The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is a fascinating piece of photographic history - it encapsulates a niche market obsession with 3D imaging ahead of its time. If you want a fun, quirky camera to experiment with stereoscopic photos and prioritize image color vibrancy and a large screen, it’s a worthy choice. However, it lacks speed, stabilization, and versatility.

The Olympus Stylus 5010 embodies practical simplicity with an ultracompact, stabilized design that leans more toward everyday carry, travel, and general point-and-shoot use. Its improved resolution, lens flexibility, and video capabilities make it the better all-rounder for most users on a budget.

Who Should Buy the FujiFilm Real 3D W3?

• 3D photo enthusiasts or technophiles curious about stereoscopic imaging
• Photographers who favor color punch and aperture priority controls
• Those who prioritize screen size and immersive viewing

Who Should Opt for Olympus Stylus 5010?

• Casual photographers needing a pocketable, stabilized zoom
• Travelers wanting quick snapshots, video capability, and easy handling
• Budget-conscious buyers looking for superior image detail and general use

While both cameras show their age today, they offer valuable lessons in balancing innovation and practicality. In my experience, the Olympus 5010 wins the “everyday best compact” crown here, while FujiFilm’s Real 3D W3 remains an intriguing collector’s piece and novelty.

Parting Thoughts on Vintage Compacts and Future Directions

Reviewing decade-old cameras is an exercise in nostalgia and perspective. The leaps since 2010 - especially in sensor tech, autofocus sophistication, connectivity, and video - are staggering. Yet these cameras remind us how manufacturers once balanced creativity (like Fuji’s 3D marvel) with consumer needs (Olympus’s pragmatic ultracompact).

If you’re an enthusiast today, I’d recommend investing in recent mirrorless models that deliver vastly superior image quality and versatility. But for collectors, retro shoot challenges, or those who simply love quirky cameras with personality, the FujiFilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus Stylus 5010 hold enduring appeal.

Thanks for joining me on this deep dive into two fascinating compacts. Happy shooting, whether in 3D or good old-fashioned 2D!