Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 9000
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was introduced 16 months later than the 9000 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 scores against the 9000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus 9000
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 16 months |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| 9000 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus 9000
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 offers outer measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus 9000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs the 9000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and 9000 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and 9000.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus 9000 to offer you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju 9000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-08-17 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,150 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $900 | $300 |