Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 6020
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus 6020, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and 6020 (13MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was introduced 7 months after the 6020 so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 scores vs the 6020 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus 6020
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| 6020 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus 6020
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 provides outside dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus 6020 has proportions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus 6020 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 compared to the 6020.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and 6020 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and 6020.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus 6020 to offer greater detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-08-17 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,150 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 122g (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $900 | $279 |