Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-310
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-310, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was released 4 months before the TG-310 and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 scores versus the TG-310 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-310. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus TG-310
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| TG-310 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-310
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | January 2011 | Similar generation |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has outside measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-310 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus the TG-310.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-310 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The visual underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-310.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-310 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-08-17 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 1,150 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $900 | $0 |