Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-320
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was introduced 17 months prior to the TG-320 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up against the TG-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus TG-320
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| TG-320 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 17 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-320
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 offers outside measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 against the TG-320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The photograph below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-320.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to provide more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-08-17 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,150k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $900 | $0 |