Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was manufactured 21 months earlier than the TG-1 iHS which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades vs the TG-1 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 610k | Sharper screen (+540k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| TG-1 iHS | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2012 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 21 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 enjoys physical measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-1 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The photograph here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-1 iHS.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-1 iHS to produce more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-08-17 | 2012-05-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,150 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $900 | $399 |