Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-4
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was manufactured 5 years prior to the TG-4 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up against the TG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus TG-4
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| TG-4 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 56 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-4
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 enjoys physical dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 compared to the TG-4.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-4 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and TG-4.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-4 to show more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-08-17 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,150 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $900 | $379 |