Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VG-145
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Olympus VG-145, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and VG-145 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was released 11 months earlier than the VG-145 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades versus the VG-145 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Olympus VG-145. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus VG-145
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| VG-145 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 11 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus VG-145
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 provides physical measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Olympus VG-145 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 compared to the VG-145.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and VG-145 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and VG-145.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus VG-145 to result in greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus VG-145 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus VG-145 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-08-17 | 2011-07-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,150k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 4.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 120g (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $900 | $0 |