Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-320
90 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was revealed 11 months before the VR-320 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up vs the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| VR-320 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 11 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 enjoys external dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 against the VR-320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and VR-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The image below will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and VR-320.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to produce more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Real 3D W3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-08-17 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,150k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $900 | $179 |
