Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-330
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus VR-330, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and VR-330 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was introduced 5 months before the VR-330 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up vs the VR-330 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus VR-330
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| VR-330 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus VR-330
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | February 2011 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has got external measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and the VR-330.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and VR-330 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The picture below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and VR-330.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus VR-330 to deliver more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-08-17 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,150k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $900 | $220 |