Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was released 3 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1150k | 920k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
XZ-2 iHS | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | August 2010 | Fresher by 28 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 offers external measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 against the XZ-2 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and XZ-2 iHS is 90 and 85 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-08-17 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,150k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $900 | $450 |