Clicky

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
90
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Fujifilm Real 3D W3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
  • Announced August 2010
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Announced December 2012
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Here is a extensive overview of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was released 3 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 Fujifilm Real 3D W3 XZ-2 iHS 
Display dimensions3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1150k920kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3

 XZ-2 iHS Fujifilm Real 3D W3 
AnnouncedDecember 2012August 2010Fresher by 28 months
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 Fujifilm Real 3D W3 XZ-2 iHS 
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 offers external measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 against the XZ-2 iHS.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and XZ-2 iHS is 90 and 85 respectively.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and XZ-2 iHS.

As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography highlights
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
46
has manual focus
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Street photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography features
45
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
heavier than competition (230 grams)
66
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
heavier than others in class (346 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
better than average battery pack (340 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
48
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (230 grams)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
61
better than average battery pack (340 shots)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (346g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm Real 3D W3
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
26
very good size screen (3.5")
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
55
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (340 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
does not have Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
21
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic socket
heavier than competition (230g)
36
really wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has mic jack
does not have selfie friendly screen
heavier than others in class (346 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-08-17 2012-12-18
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip 3D RP(Real Photo) HD -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus range 8cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,150k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 1/4 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.60 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 230 gr (0.51 lbs) 346 gr (0.76 lbs)
Physical dimensions 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 49
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 216
Other
Battery life - 340 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-50 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $900 $450