Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX3
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Ricoh CX3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was unveiled 3 months later than the CX3 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 scores vs the CX3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Ricoh CX3
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1150k | 920k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| CX3 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Ricoh CX3
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 | June 2010 | Same age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has physical dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Ricoh CX3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 against the CX3.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and CX3 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and CX3.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos although you will want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-08-17 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,150 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $900 | $329 |