Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-4
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was introduced 4 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades vs the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Ricoh WG-4
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1150k | 460k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| WG-4 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | August 2010 | More recent by 42 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Ricoh WG-4
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 provides outer dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 compared to the WG-4.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WG-4 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The visual below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and WG-4.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to offer you greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-08-17 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,150k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $900 | $330 |